Seems we’ve got another fan theory to deal with. What is the subject, Dave?
Dave: The 1994 movie Pulp Fiction, by Quentin Tarantino. I’m a bit surprised we haven’t talked about this before, actually. It’s among the most famous theories in cinematic history.
Is that so? In that case, I’ve no doubt it’s a real winner… Oh well, go on then.
Dave: The Briefcase contained Marsellus Wallace’s soul!
I see… And what are the arguments?
Dave: Well, first off, the combination to the briefcase is 666. The number of the beast.
Right…
Dave: This, coupled with the glowing light, as well as Marsellus having a band aid on the back of his head is more than enough to prove that it’s a soul in there.
OK… I will concede that the briefcase has the combination 666.
Dave: You see!
However, you could just as easily make the argument that it’s just an easy to remember combination for a three digit lock.
Most people who have a combination lock or a password will keep it something simple, to remember it easier. Is it then so unthinkable that someone would take one of the most easily remembered three digit combinations known to man to lock a briefcase?
(There’s also the amusing tidbit that, according to the oldest surviving copy of the Book of Revelation, which was mistranslated at first, the number of the beast is actually 616.)
The thing you need to understand about the briefcase is the history behind it. The original idea was that it was filled with diamonds. However, Tarantino had already used diamonds as a plot point in Reservoir dogs and changed it to something unspecified. When asked about it, you know what Tarantino himself said was in it?
Whatever you want it to be
See, in the end, it doesn’t matter what was in the briefcase. It’s just a plot item. A McGuffin. It’s not important to know what it is. All that matters is that we, the audience, know that whatever is in it is important.
Dave: But what about the glowing light?
I’m glad you asked. That was a last minute addition, with someone sticking a yellow bulb in the briefcase before filming. Because of this addition, which wasn’t in the script, the “something” in the briefcase became “something magical”. Of course, the same movie also has Mia Wallace make a square appear in the air without anyone questioning it, so perhaps we should just consider it artistic license, with the movie telling us “Whatever is in this is awesome”.
Which actually brings me to a very important detail: Vince Vega.
Dave: What about him?
Well, durign the scene where Vince and Jules visit the apartment where they find the briefcase, it is Vince that finds it, right?
Dave: Right…?
And it is also he that opens the briefcase, with the aforementioned code, and confirms the content to Jules. Not long after, one of the people in the apartment bursts out of the bathroom holding a huge revolver, which he fires at Vince and Jules. However, the bullets miss the pair completely, which Jules takes as divine intervention. This forms the basis for Jules’ entire character arc in the movie. Now, while Jules is undergoing a full spiritual revelation, Vince is completely dismissive of it.
Jules: We should be fucking dead, man.
Vince: I know. We got lucky.
Jules: No, no, no, this shit wasn’t luck. […] Don’t do that! Don’t fucking blow this off! What just happened here was a fucking miracle!
Vince: Chill, Jules, this shit happens!
Jules: Wrong! Wrong! This shit doesn’t just happen!
Vince: D’ya wanna continue this theological discussion in a car, or in a jailhouse with the cops?
Jules: We should be fucking dead, my friend! What happened here was a miracle, and I want you to fucking acknowledge it!
Dave: Right. What’s your point?
My point is, why is Vince being dismissive about it? Why does he try to explain it away and dismiss it and think Jules is being completely ridiculous?
Dave: What? Why wouldn’t he?
Because if this theory is true, Vince Vegas has seen a soul! He was sent to the apartment to find a soul. HE opened the briefcase, HE inspected the contents, HE confirmed that yes, this is what they’re looking for!
So wouldn’t it stand to reason, as the only one of the two who has had close, first hand exposure to something that by all rights is not just supernatural, but divine, that he’d consider bullets deflected by way of divine intervention to not only be possible, but outright likely?
Which means that if this theory was true, he wouldn’t have brought it again in the car, which means he wouldn’t have shot Marvin, so they wouldn’t have had to go to Jimmie Dimmick and had to get help from the Wolf… in short, if this theory was true, the rest of Vince and Jules’ story wouldn’t have happened!
Dave: Uhm… Ah, but what about the band aid?
The what?
Dave: The band aid on the back of Marsellus’ head!
What about it…?
Dave: That PROVES that it’s Marsellus’ soul!
What? How?
Dave: How? Don’t you know anything?! It’s a well known fact that according to legend, when the devil takes your soul, he takes it out the back of your head!
Aha, I see…
Dave: Yeah! Clever, huh?
That’s not the word I’d use to describe it. I think I’d go for “Stupid” or “Insane” instead.
Dave: Why?
Well, I did some looking around, when I first heard that argument. And you know something kind of funny?
Dave: What?
This “well known fact”? I couldn’t find a single, solitary scrap of evidence anywhere to support it. Not in any religion or mythology. Plenty of stories of souls leaving through the mouth and the eyes being called the “windows of the soul”, but no mention of the back of your head.
Dave: Really?
Well… no, not really. In fact, I did find several mentions of souls being taken through the back of the head.
Dave: Ha! See?
The only problem? Every single one of them was in reference to THIS FAN THEORY! You know what that says to me, Dave?
Dave: Uhm…
It says to me that here, we are looking at the absolute worst kind of fan theorists. See, your average garden variety bad fan theorist will cherry pick facts and outright ignore details contradicting their conclusions. They will misunderstand details out of ignorance or laziness.
These are the fan theorists I usually deal with, and dislike.
With this fan theory, on the other hand, we have a whole different issue. Here, someone has decided on a conclusion, gone out to cherry pick facts… and when they couldn’t find facts to support them, they FABRICATED facts to prove their point.
Until this fan theory, I put it to you that this fact has never appeared, let alone been held as widely established and accepted dogma, in ANY ORGANIZED RELIGION. Until someone supplies me with evidence to the contrary, I will say that this “fact” was fabricated by a moron (who unsurprisingly missed the point) for the EXPRESS PURPOSE of justifying this one, stupid fan theory.
That, to me, is downright disgusting! I can’t imagine how anyone who would support this theory could call themselves a fan of the movie and still look themselves in the mirror.
Dave: Aren’t you being a bit harsh about this?
This fan theory is the antithesis of everything a good fan theory should be; On top of missing fundamental details, it required knowingly lying to validate the point its trying to make! You think this is harsh? I should hunt them down and go medieval on them!
If I may paraphrase my own favourite passage from the Bible.
Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy stupid ones against the stones